appear.in, a video conferencing tool that uses WebRTC (in-browser media compression and streaming), honestly has pretty bad sound and picture quality compared to Skype.
I tried using an appear.in room to stream my webcam back home on demand, but it sucked, so I made an extra Skype account instead and had my roommate log into it and enable auto-answer on it.
Risky? Nah. Nothing interesting happens in the living room when I'm not there. I just want to check on my cat from time to time.
@thor It's got noticeably worse on the free accounts since they started pushing premium.
As a premium subscriber, appear.in is great, but the best quality I've experienced is through Zoom (company I'm working for has accounts)
@dajbelshaw They lower the bitrate? Doesn't sound like a good sales strategy. When I talk about quality, and mention WebRTC explicitly, it's because I'm not only talking about the bitrate, but the quality of the noise filtering and echo cancellation, which is an issue with how WebRTC is implemented, not appear.in as such. The noise filter is too aggressive, and the echo cancellation is leaky. Skype seems to have much better algorithms.
@dajbelshaw You sometimes wonder if the people who design these systems don't actually test them.
I have heard one good noise filter, and it's a very simple one that I designed myself. It doesn't do any frequency filtering. Instead, it checks if the input level is pulsing or not. Speech is rhythmic, so it passes through the filter. When there's no speech, it simply lowers the volume. The background noise is audible when there's speech, but at least you can hear the other person clearly.